Spotlight on Small-Press Theatre Journals: From Local Clubs to the West End—Scaling Scholarly Platforms

Hook: From a 60‑seat club to a national stage—what niche platforms teach journals about scale

Editors, scholarly societies, and community publishers face a familiar pain: how to grow readership, attract higher‑quality submissions, and secure indexing without losing the editorial voice that built trust. The story of the play Gerry & Sewell—which began in a 60‑seat social club in Gateshead in 2022 and reached the West End by 2025—offers a vivid analogy. It shows how a tight, authentic voice and community roots can be preserved even as a platform scales up. This article translates that adaptation arc into an actionable blueprint for small‑press and society publishing journals aiming to expand reach, improve metadata & indexing (DOIs, Crossref, OAI‑PMH, JATS XML) and secure long‑term sustainability while retaining community ties and editorial identity.

Executive summary: What editors need now (2026)

In 2026, funder mandates, platform consolidation, and AI tools‑augmented workflows are reshaping journal publishing. Small community journals can scale successfully by combining these four moves:

• Formalize governance to protect editorial voice and standards;
• Invest in metadata & indexing (DOIs, Crossref, OAI‑PMH, JATS XML) to unlock discoverability;
• Diversify revenue through society support, grants, library partnerships, and targeted APC strategies;
• Grow audience with partnerships and community‑led content while using modern analytics to measure impact.

Gerry & Sewell as a blueprint for scaling community publishing

Theatre critic responses to Gerry & Sewell highlighted two reasons it scaled: (1) an authentic voice rooted in local life and politics and (2) strategic partnerships and production upgrades that transported that voice to larger stages without diluting it. For journals, the same dynamics apply:

• Local authenticity = editorial niche and loyal contributors/readers.
• Production upgrades = platform, metadata, and indexing improvements that let content be found and reused.
• Partnerships (producers, funders, critics) = society partners, libraries, and disciplinary networks that provide resources and credibility.

“Hope in the face of adversity” captures the play’s appeal. For community journals, the equivalent is trust: readers trust you to represent a discipline or region honestly—don’t trade that for scale.

Why small‑press and society journals must scale (and why they resist)

Scaling is not just about prestige. It addresses practical needs: increased submissions, better indexing, stable funding, and improved discoverability for authors. Yet many resist because growth can threaten the editorial voice that created the community. The challenge—and opportunity—is to scale like an adaptation, not a takeover.

Key 2026 trends shaping opportunities

• Wider adoption of AI tools in editorial triage and language polishing has cut time‑to‑decision—but editors must guard against losing human judgement.
• Library consortia and funder coalitions increasingly fund independent journals via transformative agreements and community publishing grants (late 2024–2025 pilots expanded in 2026).
• Indexers and aggregators improve support for smaller titles that meet metadata standards—making technical investment more impactful.
• Preprint and overlay journal models have matured, giving niche journals paths to visibility without sacrificing rigorous peer review.

Practical roadmap: How to scale a community journal without losing voice

Below is a step‑by‑step plan with tactical actions, timelines, and KPIs. Think of it as adapting a club production for the West End, one deliberate upgrade at a time.

1. Define non‑negotiables: editorial voice and mission (0–3 months)

Start by documenting what makes your journal distinct.

• Write a 1‑page mission statement highlighting scope, audience, and editorial tone.
• Set editorial guardrails: what content is core vs. experimental.
• Create a contributor charter that commits to community engagement and ethical standards.

KPI: mission statement published; contributor charter signed by editorial board.

2. Strengthen governance (0–6 months)

Protect independence and continuity as you grow.

• Formalize a governance model (editorial board, advisory council, society oversight if applicable).
• Adopt transparent editorial policies (peer review type, COI, complaints procedure).
• Use term limits and succession planning to avoid personality‑driven drift.

KPI: policies published; board composition and terms announced.

3. Upgrade production & metadata (3–9 months)

Visibility scales with metadata quality. Treat metadata like staging and lighting for a theatre transfer—invest where the audience will see it.

• Register DOIs via Crossref for all articles; supply complete metadata.
• Deliver full‑text in JATS XML to enable indexing and archiving.
• Implement OAI‑PMH for harvesters; register with DOAJ and other subject directories where eligible.
• Integrate ORCID in submission forms to improve author discoverability.

KPI: DOIs assigned; JATS XML pipeline running; OAI‑PMH endpoint live.

4. Prioritize indexing growth (6–18 months)

Indexing unlocks discovery and citations—but it requires sustained quality signals and technical compliance.

• Start with accessible indexes: DOAJ (OA journals), Google Scholar, and subject repositories.
• Work toward Scopus and Clarivate indexing by improving editorial consistency and citation practices; document editorial policies and peer review processes for applications.
• Use altmetrics and usage statistics to demonstrate engagement during applications.

KPI: acceptance into one major index; measurable uplift in article views and citations.

5. Diversify funding and ensure sustainability (3–24 months)

Funding models should protect editorial independence and reflect community values.

• Assess all possible revenue streams: society dues, institutional subsidies, targeted APCs, sponsorships, grants, crowdfunding, library partnership agreements.
• Prefer sliding APCs or waiver programs to protect authors from low‑income regions and early‑career researchers.
• Pursue one‑off grants for infrastructure (metadata, XML conversion) rather than operational costs when possible.

KPI: 12‑month budget with diversified revenue and contingency plan.

6. Expand audience while protecting community ties (6–24 months)

Scaling audience doesn’t mean abandoning the source community. Use alliances and curated programming.

• Partner with learned societies, regional libraries, and hybrid events for themed special issues and events.
• Maintain a local series (e.g., “Voices from the Region”) to anchor identity while launching broader topical series for international reach.
• Use social media strategically: amplify author stories and data visualizations rather than raw publication announcements.

KPI: retention of core contributor base; growth in international submissions and readership.

7. Adopt technology for efficiency & fairness (6–18 months)

Submission platforms (Open Journal Systems, Janeway, Scholastica) and workflow tools can reduce administrative burden—use them to augment, not replace, editorial judgement.

• Implement submission platforms (Open Journal Systems, Janeway, Scholastica) that support metadata exports and integrations.
• Use AI for language polishing and initial triage but require human sign‑off for decisions and ethics checks.
• Deploy plagiarism detection, reviewer anonymity features, and clear audit trails.

KPI: reduced median time‑to‑first‑decision; improved editorial capacity without sacrificing quality.

Editorial voice: how to preserve the ‘club’ feel on a larger stage

Editorial voice is a brand of trust. Like a play retaining regional dialects on a West End stage, a journal can scale yet remain recognisably itself by institutionalizing that voice.

• Publish author interviews, editorials, and community notes that reflect local perspectives.
• Commission essays that translate local case studies into themes of wider relevance.
• Create mentorship programs that pair community authors with experienced editors to improve submission readiness without gatekeeping voice.

KPI: stable proportion of articles from core community; positive feedback in reader surveys.

Indexing growth: tactical checklist

1. Ensure consistent publication schedule and archival policy (CLOCKSS/LOCKSS).
2. Provide complete metadata to Crossref and other registries (abstracts, keywords, affiliations, ORCID).
3. Publish transparent peer review and editorial policies on your site.
4. Track usage metrics, citations, and altmetrics to support indexer applications.
5. Be prepared to respond to indexer queries with archival proof and governance documentation.

Funding models that scale (and how to choose)

There is no single correct revenue model. Choose one that aligns with your mission and community: the key is diversifying to reduce risk.

• Society subsidy: stable but vulnerable to membership dips.
• Institutional support: library partnerships and transformative agreements offer predictable funding in exchange for OA publishing capacity.
• APCs: viable if accompanied by waivers and equity policies.
• Grants & philanthropy: excellent for capital projects—metadata, platforms, archival services.
• Community funding: subscriptions, donations, or crowdfunding can underline community ownership.

Action: build a 3‑year financial model showing break‑even points for each revenue mix.

Sustainability and ethics: avoid predatory traps

As you grow, maintain clear transparency to avoid being mistaken for predatory outlets.

• Publish clear fee schedules, peer review timelines, and editorial board affiliations.
• Keep author fees proportional and explain waivers openly.
• Use recognized indexing and membership badges (Crossref, DOAJ) to signal legitimacy.

KPI: compliance with COPE guidelines and inclusion in DOAJ/Directory of Open Access Repositories where appropriate.

Advanced strategies for audience expansion and impact

Beyond indexing, consider content and distribution innovations that increase attention and citations.

• Release plain‑language summaries and short video abstracts to widen readership to practitioners and policymakers.
• Host hybrid events and special issues in partnership with professional societies to create shareable content and media coverage.
• Experiment with overlay journal models or micro‑journals that curate preprints and add editorial value.
• Use targeted SEO for article landing pages: strong titles, structured metadata, schema.org markup, and shareable assets.

Metrics that matter (2026 edition)

Track a balanced set of indicators, not just citations:

• Submission volume and acceptance rate
• Time to first decision and publication
• Downloads, geographic distribution of readers
• Altmetric scores and social engagements
• Indexing milestones (DOAJ, Scopus, Clarivate)
• Funding diversity index (percent of revenue by source)

Case study roadmap: Imagining a journal’s 24‑month journey (practical timeline)

Month 0–3: Mission, governance, and baseline analytics. Month 3–9: Metadata upgrades, DOI registration, ORCID integration. Month 6–12: Apply to DOAJ and subject indexes; pilot a special issue with a partner society. Month 12–18: Pursue larger indexing (Scopus/Clarivate), secure multi‑year funding, implement XML workflows. Month 18–24: Expand events, launch mentorship program, measure impact and publish an annual report.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Growing too fast: Rapid expansion without governance can dilute voice—use staged rollouts.
• Overreliance on APCs: Risks excluding contributors—combine revenue streams and offer waivers.
• Neglecting metadata: No indexing without consistent metadata—treat it as a first‑class product feature.
• Letting AI run unchecked: Use AI for efficiency, but keep human editors accountable for decisions.

Resources & quick checklist

• Crossref: DOI registration and metadata best practices
• DOAJ: open access indexing criteria
• COPE: publishing ethics guidance
• OJS/Janeway: open platforms for scalable workflows
• CLOCKSS/LOCKSS: long‑term archiving services

Quick checklist (printable): mission, governance, DOIs, JATS XML, ORCID, OAI‑PMH, DOAJ application, funding plan, community programming.

Final thoughts: scaling as an adaptation, not an abandonment

Theater producers carried the voice of Gateshead to the Aldwych by preserving the characters, tone, and political edge that made the play resonate. Small‑press and society journals can do the same: scale what matters, professionalize what’s necessary, and keep the community at the centre. In 2026, technical infrastructure and new funding pathways make this more achievable than ever—but only if you plan deliberately.

Call to action

If you edit or advise a community journal, start today: publish a 1‑page mission statement, register DOIs for your last 12 articles, and reach out to one potential library partner. Need a tailored scaling plan? Contact our editorial consultancy at journals.biz for an audit and a 12‑month roadmap that preserves your editorial voice while increasing indexing, readership, and sustainability.

Related Reading

• Hybrid Afterparties & Premiere Micro‑Events: How Hollywood Reimagined Nightlife and Fan Engagement in 2026
• Hands-On Review: Micro-Feedback Workflows and the New Submission Experience (Field Notes, 2026)
• Low‑Cost Tech Stack for Pop‑Ups and Micro‑Events: Tools & Workflows That Actually Move Product (2026)
• How Micro-Apps Are Reshaping Small Business Document Workflows in 2026
• Asda Express Expansion and the Future of Convenience for Drivers: Micro-Services, EV Charging and On-the-Go Needs
• Checklist: Tech to Pack for Move‑In Day (and What You Can Skip)
• DIY Micro-Apps for Self-Care: Build Fast Tools to Simplify Your Day
• From Stove to Global Bars: How DIY Cocktail Culture Can Elevate Villa Welcome Kits
• Can Smart Lamps Reduce Driver Fatigue? Nighttime Mood Lighting and Road Safety